BUFORA Journal Volume 05 No 06 March April 1977

Winchester Encounter—see plO
Impression by Jennifer Cook

British UFO Research Association

ai ill

IP w w-

Vol 5 No 6 March/April 1977

Council 1976/7

President

Geoffrey G Doel, mrcs lrcp dmre
Vice-presidents

The Rt Hon Earl of Clancarty
Leonard G Cramp, ARABS MSIA
Prof Bryan Winder, bsc ceng fimeche
Graham F N Knewstub, ceng miere fbis

Council chairman
Lionel Beer

Council members

Steve Gamble, aimls

Mrs Anne Harcourt

Charles F Lockwood, ba, dip ed stud

Richard Nash

CAE O’Brien, cbe ba fras frgs fgs

Norman Oliver, fras

Tony Pace, fras

Miss Jenny Randles

Stephen Smith ma

Mark Stenhoff, fras, afbis

Miss Betty Wood

Advertisements

Personal column: 2p a word. Display
rates: whole page £10-00j half page £6-00;
quarter page £3-00. Outside back cover:
£12’00; half page £7-00.

Advertisement copy: 15 Freshwater Court,
Crawford Street, London WIH IHS

Cover design: Richard Beet

Bufora Branches

Yorkshire: Trevor Whitaker, 8 Central
Park, Wellhead, Halifax HXl 2BT

Edinburgh: Peter A Hill, 1 Cambridge
Gdns, Leith, Edinburgh EH6 5DH.

Irish: John A Hind, 19 Cairnshill Avenue,
Belfast BT8 4NR.

with Member Societies

Administration Department

General correspondence:

Miss Betty Wood, 6 Cairn Avenue,

London W5. Tel: 01-579 3796
Membership secretary:

Mrs Anne Harcourt, “Harkendown,”

Epping Road, Roydon, Harlow, Essex

Treasurer:

Stephen Smith, ma, 5 Arndale Road,

Sherwood, Nottingham N95 3GT

Publications Department

Journal editor:

Norman Oliver, 95 Taunton Road,

London SE12 8PA. Tel: 01-852 7653

Editorial assistants:

Pauline Grego
Mrs V Martin

Publications co-ordinator and distribution:

Arnold West, 16 Southway, Burgess Hill,
Sussex RH15 9ST. Tel: 044 46 6738

Research and Investigations Department

Research director:

Tony Pace, Newchapel Observatory,
Newchapel, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffs

Research co-ordinator:

Jenny Randles, 23 Sunningdale Drive,

Warn, Greater Manchester M30 6NJ
Tel: 061 775 4749

Research projects officer:

Charles Lockwood, 5 The Ridgeway, Cyijf'
Famsfield, Newark, Notts

National investigations co-ordinator: i s- c ?
Ken Phillips, 13 Falcon Avenue, ^ ^ '
Springfield Est, Milton Keynes, Bucks
Training officer:

Trevor Whitaker, 8 Central Park,

Wellhead, Halifax HXl 2BT

Overseas liaison officer :

Bryan Hardey,

23 Hastings Road,

Thornton-le-Fylde, Lancs.

Tel: Cleveleys 74417

Btffora Journal is published six times a year and is available to members only, or by exchange.
The British UFO Rese^ch Association does not hold or express corporate views on UFO
phenomena. Contributions reflect only the views of the editor or the authors. Copy for pub¬
lication in the Journal must be sent directly to the editor andnot to any other Bufora officer. Original
material is copyright to both the contributor and to Bufora. Requests for permission to re¬
produce material from Xhv Journal should be addressed to the editor.

BUFORA JOURNAL

Volume 5 Number 6 March/April 1977

Editorial Address : 95 Taunton Road, London SE12 SPA

Contents

Vange Delta

2

Research and Investigations
Section

3

Points from the Press

6

Uforum

8

The Winchester Encounters

10

Have you read . . . . ?

18

Sighting Summaries

20

Personal Column

Hi

Editorial

Up, down, around or .... ?

As an association, Bufora holds no
corporate views on the UFO enigma:
its activities are aimed at uncovering
the truth behind UFO manifestations
in whatever direction that truth may lie.

Many members have—and are fully
entitled to—their own theories and
ideas on the subject, and these may
range from the ETH to the Hollow
Earth theory, via psychic phenomena,
ultra-terrestrials and all points be¬
tween and around. Recently I’ve been
mulling over the different theories and
found I couldn’t help but come to the
conclusion that perhaps hitherto I’d
given the ETH too much consider¬
ation. Mind you. I’ve always held the
view that no one source can be held
responsible for all unidentified reports,
nor am I now dismissing the possibility
of extra-terrestrial visitations out of

hand: certainly I think they should
have a place in our deliberations, but
I do feel we may well be expending
rather too much effort in what con¬
ceivably could be entirely the wrong
direction.

Just about one common factor emerges
from the examination of sighting re¬
ports in general—their diversity. At
times it almost seems that people are
vying with one another to claim some¬
thing different, and when one comes to
consider landing, occupant and con¬
tact claims, the diversity becomes even
more apparent. At some time or
another, you know, we’ve been con¬
tacted (or have we?) by beings or
humanoids from almost all the planets
in our solar system including some as
yet undiscovered! Not only that, but
‘ indigenous inhabitants ’ from all the
nearer star systems and some of the
more distant ones too, have put in an
appearance, plus not a few from stars
and galaxies we’ve never heard of!
We’ve been contacted by entities from
places manifestly that do not exist, for
example; a ‘ Twin Earth ’ and the
‘ Galaxy of Gennymedes ’—this latter
allegedly being situated 12 light-years
away, which would well and truly place
it inside our own Milky Way, only a
celestial ‘ stones-throw ’ from the Sun!
The odd thing is that reports featuring
the more unlikely origins not infre¬
quently have a greater degree of
independent confirmation.

So—unless we dismiss automatically
each and every reported contact as a
hoax, where does all this lead? Are
we asking the right questions ? If not,
what should we be asking ? Well,
what do YOU think?

Norman Oliver.

1

Vange Delta

Many unusual reports have come from
Essex over the past ten years or more,
and this one, investigated by Andy
Collins, is clearly something more
than the average LITS sighting.

On 12 December 1976, Mr & Mrs
Jennings and their two children were
returning to their home in Vange from
a children’s party, travelling north,
when their son caught sight of some
lights in the sky directly ahead. His
parents saw them also. The lights
seemed very low and still and coloured
red, blue, white and green about 100
yards away.

They kept their eyes on the lights until
they were right underneath them, then
Mr Jennings stopped the car and they
all got out. Looking up, they could
see the dark shape of a delta or triangle
directly above: the green light was no
longer visible, but on the left hand side
of the object there were three large red
lights spaced quite far apart: on the
right hand side there was a blue light,
again large, whilst on the back were
three white lights set close together.
All the lights were flashing on and off
in no set pattern, and the object also
seemed to have an orange-red haze
around it.

The object was ‘ about three houses
high ’ and perfectly still: the only
noise to be heard was that of passing
cars. After about two or three min¬
utes the object began to move away
from overhead point first towards the
north-west—^as Mr Jennings put it,
‘ It was as if it had seen us.' It went
very slowly and gracefully and was lost
to view over some nearby houses: the
total duration was about seven or eight
minutes and no sound at all had been
heard to come from the object.

The investigator was impressed with
the sincerity of the witnesses who were
genuinely worried and puzzled by
what they had seen. They were pos¬
itive it was no aircraft because of the
large lights and the faa that it hovered
and made no sound. Southend air¬
port movements confirm that there
were no aircraft in the area between
1600 and about 1800 that day: the
sighting occurred at approx. 1715.

N.B.—This sighting report arrived after the
table of sightings in this issue had been completed.
It mil therefore actually be listed in the table in
the May I June Journal — Ed.

2

Research & Investigations Section

What goes in—should come out!

When we receive a report on a UFO
investigation from the investigator, I
am sure that you have often wondered
what happens to it, and it was partly to
look at this question that the sub¬
section on catdoguing and data pro¬
cessing was arranged at the Birming¬
ham Conference.

A good deal depends on the classific¬
ation of a report under the Bufora
system, (as outlined in the May/June
'16 Journal). The majority of reports
have as much detail on them as possible
and quite probably relate to an ex¬
plicable natural or man-made event.
These are usually the Class 3 or 4
reports, although it’s possible some of
these might be worthy of further
study. If a report is deemed so
worthy, as all Class 1 and 2 reports
automatically are, it then goes through
the various adviser and consultant
evaluation teams, and throughout the
following six months or so, receives
written reports by experts in various
fields which may either produce a
written explanation or leave the case
unidentified. These reports then go,
along with all closed reports not eval¬
uated, to the research department.

At the research department, as research
co-ordinator, I deal with them first.
My job is to extract the important
cases (ie: the potential unidentifieds as
indicated by investigators and evalu¬
ators) and ensure (i) that results of any
further work are added to the report
summary which will have been sent to
ihQ Journal-, (ii) possibly write up some
cases for international circulation via
Flying Saucer Review, (iii) send periodic
coded lists to Ufocat, the computer file
operated by the Center for UFO
Studies in the USA and (iv) ensure
that the reports are entered onto
Bufora’s punch card analysis system.

The main files then pass to the Re¬
search Director for inclusion in the
data bank.

There are several different ways in
which data can be stored. Obviously
the computer is best, but it’s expensive
to operate and Bufora only has indirect
access. Most small organisations,
local groups, etc., will just put reports
into a chronological pile. This is fine
when only a few reports are considered,
but once we reach the several thousand
which Bufora has, it is clearly im¬
possible to search out any relevant
data. A medium size batch of in¬
formation, such as the 600 or so Nufon
has, can suffice a solution utilising two
distinct types of file. One is the card
index, which files basic data of each
case in chronological order and give
reference to the main file. The other
is what is termed a data-retrieval form
which includes all relevant material on
a single-sided form. This can be
readily photo-copied so that researchers
can obtain information on particular
cases from the Nufon files.

The Bufora system has been devised
over many years of work, initially by
Stephen Smith, and is, in our opinion,
the next best thing to a computer.
This utilises the punch cards which
have a binary coded series of holes
which enable all basic data to be in¬
cluded on a card in very simple terms
(by clipping out appropriate holes in a
coded list). Extraction of data be¬
comes remarkably easy because it’s
simply a matter of deciding what is
needed (eg: all green objects), then
punching through the holes referring
to this piece of data. In this case all
green objects will have had these holes
punched out, and consequently if a
knitting needle is placed through the
stack of cards at this point, all those
continued overleaf

3

which are not green will stick, and all
those which are will fall through be¬
cause the holes are punched out. The
cards do not need to be in any order
because there are codings for dates, etc.
and several pieces of data can be
extracted simply by carrying through
the operation several times. In
other words, it is very possible im¬
mediately to extract from the cards
(which will ultimately cover all Bufora
cases), for example, every object col¬
oured green seen in the county of Essex
on a Wednesday in July, etc. etc.

Eventually this system will enable
request for information on reports to
be answered very quickly, and data
read-outs will be possible, just as with
a computer. Obviously they will take
longer to prepare, but will in no way be
more restricted than those a computer
could provide. In fact, it will be a way
of bringing the processed data back to
the fingertips of those who provided
it—the investigators.

Another method used is the produc¬
tion of catalogues. One example of
this is the Vehicle Interference Cata¬
logue Bufora will be publishing in the
near future. This is a codified listing
of all cases involving some type of
interference with a motorised vehicle.
The collation of all the material into
one place being an important base for
research, Bufora is working with Con¬
tact and Nufon to prepare a regional
catalogtie for Northern England which
will list all reports from all sources
throughout history. This will be ad¬

ded to by various indices, such as
locational lists of reports, and it is
hoped it will form the first link in a
chain of such catalogues covering the
whole UK, though obviously this will
need individual help within the regions
to search out newspaper files, etc.

I hope all of this shows that Bufora is
concerned about what happens to your
material once it is sent in. You are
not sending in masses of paperwork for
no reason. You are a vital link in a
process which will lead ultimately to an
understanding of the UFO phen¬
omenon, and don’t forget all future
reasearch depends absolutely on the
quality of the initial report you send in
to Bufora.

Data systems

The work involved in upgrading the
actual research files is progressing
smoothly. All cases have been given
a preliminary classification in four
evaluatory groups. Red (where a pos¬
itive identification is made). Amber
(where there is insufficient data but
evidence strongly suggests an identi¬
fication), Yellow (again insufficient
data, but enough unusual parameters
to suggest that something truly un¬
known might be involved), and Green
(the best cases, with adequate evidence
of a true unknown). At the present
moment all Green and Yellow cases are
being transferred onto the punch card
system to facilitate rapid research
capabilities.

Jenny Randles.

UK Investigators Agency (Ltd). Enquiries have been received from Bufora
investigators and others with whom the above-mentioned recently formed in¬
vestigation group has been in touch. We would advise those concerned that the
subject will be debated at the next Council meeting in April when the question of
Bufora’s future relationship with this body will be discussed.

AWARENESS —^the Journal of Contact UK. For details write to J B Delair,
19 Cumnor Road, Wootton, Boar’s Hill, Near Oxford.

4

Analysis of UFO photographs and
films

I would like to advise members and
investigators of the correct procedure
to be employed where photographic
evidence is supplied to field workers.

Recently, much of this photo evidence
has been forwarded to departments,
factions and individuals not connected
with the Photographic Analysis & In¬
vestigations Dept. (PAID), with the
result that the evidence was damaged,
rendering further analysis difficult and/
or impossible.

Should investigators receive photo
evidence, they must inform either the
PAID or the NIC as soon as they can,
the procedure in such a case being as
shown in the accompanying diagram.

Remember! A UFO photo can only
be analysed properly if, and only if, the
original negative/film is submitted.

Ken Phillips, NIC.

Relevant phone numbers:

NIC.01-452-0520

PAID:

John Shaw ..01-223-3388

BobDigby .01- 902-0582

Your editor is suffering from increasing doses
of “ metricitis! ” Distances and measure¬
ments from one source may be entirely metric,
from another entirely in miles, yards and feet,
whilst in some cases a mixture of both is
adopted. As the mile is apparently not going
to ‘ go out of circulation ’ altogether, and as
most witnesses for some time to come will still
think in terms of yards, feet and inches, for
the time being I shall adopt the following
procedure:—

Where the measurements quoted are from a
metric source—Ordnance Survey map or
similar, I will use the metric system. Where
wimesses refer to distances these will be given
in yards, feet, etc. Items quoted from over¬
seas publications which include measurements
will be given exactly as per source.— Ed.

&ND

5

Points from the Press

The recent Birmingham Conference
was mentioned in the Birmingham
Evening Mail of 6 and 8 November.
More than 140 delegates of research
organisations attended, including Bir¬
mingham’s own UFO Studies Inform¬
ation Service, which works in liaison
with Bufora. Members said their
organisation works hard on scientific
facts and UFO study is gaining in
interest and respectability.

★ ★ ★

From a Swedish newspaper of 17 Nov¬
ember comes an account of three boys
who saw a blinding orange light on the
Kalix River beach on 15 November.
It disappeared, reappeared, then shot
skyward. Two other boys nearby
corroborated details of the phenomen¬
on which left a circle of burnt grass.

A similar brilliant light was seen on
the road between Dokkas and Matti-
vaara in northern Sweden by a motorist
and her daughter.

In the north of Finland, a young man
was badly burned by a ray of light
from ball of light which he and a
friend approached when it landed out¬
side an industrial area in Uleaborg.
Translation by Bob Easton.

★ * *

The Brisbane Courier-Mail of 24 Sept¬
ember reported near panic the previous
evening when four fighter bombers
trailed jet fuel at a festival opening.
The lights were too spectacular and the
terrified Brisbane public thought they
were flying saucers!

★ ★ ★

The Yorkshire Evening Post of 16
November mentions Trevor Whitaker
of Halifax, Bufora member and secre¬
tary of the Yorkshire Branch. He
explained that the latter i.s one of four

Valerie Martin.

Yorkshire and Lancashire research
groups who are teaming up to compare
data on recent UFO sightings around
Huddersfield.

★ ★ ★

In the Brisbane Courier-Mail of 17
October, Colin Phillips, president of
Queensland UFO Research Bureau,
appealed to Queenslanders not to fire
shots at UFOs after hearing of a
motorist who had emptied his gun at
one! A conference in South Aust¬
ralia was being held shortly because of
the continuing number of UFO re¬
ports since the 1975 conference in New
South Wales.

★ ★ ★

According to the American paper.
National Enquirer of 2 November, a
team of respected French scientists,
including a designer of Concorde, an¬
nounce they have solved the mystery,
of UFO propulsion after seven years
research. The three men have suc¬
cessfully tested a tiny model UFO in a
windtunnel and built a working model
of a complicated engine utilizing both
electromagnetic and nuclear energy.
The French Academy of Sciences has
published details and two scientists
discussed their discoveries at sympos¬
iums in America. One scientist said,
‘ within 10 years we'll be able to visit
other solar systems just as UFOs now
visit us.’

■it if it

The County Times & Express &
Gazette of Powys, 27 November, refers
to a lorry driver with a load of steel
near the Elan Valley, feeling ‘ scared to
death ’ when he saw a cigar shaped
thing belching orange and red flames.
It was hovering above his vehicle, but
when he stopped and got out, the object
was moving away.

6

The West Lancashire Evening Gazette
of 21 October carried an article on
UFOs, featuring Bufora’s Overseas
Liaison Officer, Bryan Hartley of
Thornton. He also holds posts with
the Northern UFO Network and earlier
in 1976 founded the Fylde Aerial
Phenomena and UFO Research Group.
An impressive collection of books and
photos on ufology, a constant quest for
information and short wave radio are
among the interests of this lively-
minded dedicated young man, who
has been confined to a wheelchair
since a motor cycle accident 10 years
ago.

* ★ ★

“ UFO puts Shah’s jet fighters out of
action! ” runs the heaffiine in Blick
magazine of 22 September. An official
statement by the Persian Ministry of
Defence admitted that two Phantom

Fighters saw a UFO which chased
them when they closed in upon it,
paralysing their electronic systems. A
circular object detached itself from the
UFO, landed briefly near Tehran, took
off again and the UFO disappeared.

★ * ★

The Guardian of 19 November, Daily
Telegraph of 24 November and the
Bristol Evening Post of 19 November,
have reports of bumps in the night
occurring in the South West of Eng¬
land. Conflicting statements from
Bristol University research team who
have recorded the noises first denied
they were made by aircraft, then said
that some booms from Concorde were
responsible. These had corresponded
with scheduled flights by British Air¬
ways and Air France, but did not
account for all noises reported from
Sussex to Cornwall at different times.

A REPETITION OF fflSTORY?

In 1923 Hermann Oberth published
a 100-page book The Rocket into
Planetary Space at his own expense.
It was a theoretical study of the
principles and possibilities of
rocket ascent. In 1925, as a direct
result, a group of young enthusiasts
founded a “ Society for Space
Travel ” . . . . and, being more of a
writer than an engineer, Oberth saw
others putting his ideas into
practice.

In 1976 Robert Morison published
a 112-page book The Vortex Message
under his own imprint Ascent at the
expense of The Interplanetary Space
Travel Research Group. It contains
a theoretical study of the principles
and possibilities of vortex levitation
.... and, being more of a writer than
an engineer, Morison foresees others
putting his ideas into practice.

ASCENT is dealing with all orders direct.
Price: £1-70 including postage etc. (UK).

$3 by surface or $4 by air mail (USA).
Address; 34 Elm Grove, London, N8 9AH

7

Uforum

Dear Mr Oliver,

I would like to comment on the article
Controversy by Peter Bottomley in
Vol 5, No 4 of the Journal.

Firstly, if, as Peter states, he has seen
a sample of reports sent in by inves¬
tigators and they were poorly compiled,
then indeed the article should have been
published: but all too often today, in
many subjects as well as Ufology, only
the bad points seem to hit the head¬
lines. I don’t know what percentage
of the reports inspected by Peter were
poor, but I’m sure there are many re¬
ports from Bufora investigators worthy
of praise. I must confess I fail to
understand how people capable of
producing such ‘ reports ’ as described
are appointed as an investigator in the
first place; surely that is where the
solution lies ? Investigators should,
I feel, be interviewed in every case in
the first instance by the local RIC for
general character reference, etc., after
all, they are representatives of Bufora,
and are the vital links between the
witness and any possible subsequent
research. Secondly, a basic test should
be implemented to determine literacy,
eligibility, attitude, etc. A trial period
could be undertaken, and confirmation
of position as investigator based on
receipt of his/her first report. On the
other hand, some investigators could
be chosen based entirely on the quality
of an initial report: perhaps a member,
trying his hand for the first time as an
investigator on his own initiative, may
reveal to the RIC or NIC good
‘ qualifications ’ at extracting inform¬
ation and compiling a subsequent
report.

Personally, I was lucky, as I began as a
‘ self-styled ’ investigator when I
founded Ufosis. But the experience
acquired was invaluable when I applied

for position as a Field Investigator for
Apro. My application was accepted,
presumably on the basis of a report I
sent in soon after my arrival in Canada.

When I dispatch a report, I am 100%
sure no information has been left out.
This is because I have adopted a
system where I use a ‘ checking-sheet ’
compiled in sections relative to partic¬
ular aspects of the report, such as:
The Witness, name, address, etc.:
The Investigators, name, address, etc.:
The Sighting, date, time, location, ref¬
erence, etc.; Samples included, labelled,
etc.: Artifacts, Photos included, labelled
etc.: Signatures —on material where
required: Copies, photo-copying com¬
pleted where required, etc., and I
always keep a copy of the report until
receiving acknowledgement of receipt
of the original. I then have a final
check to ensure (1) every part of the
report is in the envelope, (2) envelope
contains SAE for reply of receipt, (3)
envelope is addressed correctly ‘ to ’
and ‘ from ’. Very elementary pro¬
cedure, but it’s all too easy to leave
things out and it’s the elementary mis¬
takes which most often occur. Work¬
ing to the book can be a bind, but it
pays off, as I learnt when helping to
organize Ufosis. We simply couldn’t
have sumved had we not carried out a
methodical procedure in our operations.

To get back to Bufora’s investigators.
If the training programme by Trevor
Whitaker is successful, I would like to
see investigators graded according to
their capabilities (based on the training
course), and/or ‘ specialist ’ knowledge
the investigator may have—psychology,
electronics, auto-mechanics, chemistry,
physics, etc., etc. These factors should
be borne in mind when a reference to a
sighting is sent out to an investigator.

Unbalanced distribution of such ‘ spec-

8

ialists ’ could hamper the implement¬
ation of this idea due to the distance
factor, but certainly, I am sure this
procedure could be executed in a lot of
cases. Indeed the ‘ tier-system ’ of
grading investigators could help in
attempting to match the investigator
and his capabilities to the work which
will be involved in the report dis¬
patched to the investigator. For ex¬
ample, I am not well versed in the
study of chemistry. This could be a
big drawback in a ‘ traces ’ case in¬
volving samples and the handling of
same. Also, there could be a deterior¬
ation-factor with the samples over a
period of time. But if my knowledge
of chemistry was sufficient, I would be
able to carry out initial analyses. The
investigators at Ufosis, being small in
number, were able to discuss each
case and decide who would interview
the witness, etc. One policy we had,
which proved very successful, was
males to interview male witnesses;
females to interview female witnesses.

Gary Lanhatn,
Manitoba, Canada.

Gary adds a PS to the effect that (i)
even investigators well-versed in prac¬
ticed field work could learn from Inves¬
tigation Manuals and refers to the Mufon
USA Manual compiled by Raymond
Fowler {Bufora's is, of course, now
available], and (2) That a would-be
investigator should not necessarily be
barred from investigating because of
failure in the training programme since

there are excellent self-taught investig¬
ators around. Having interviewed both
male and female witnesses I am intrigued
to know how the interview policy Gary
mentioned was necessarily more successful
if the reverse wasn’t tried! An AVB
type case might show it to be so, but these
are not an everyday occurrence ! — Ed.

Dear Sir,

There are certain incidents where the
UFO has apparently secreted a white
material which has surprisingly disa¬
ppeared on coming into contact with
the ground. Could this be a by¬
product of a process used to propel the
UFO? I consider this a very inter¬
esting point since it could mean that
other beings have overcome the pol¬
lution problem, the by-product just
disappearing into nowhere.

The problem here would seem to be
that such a process would upset the
law of conservation of matter, ie:
matter can neither be created nor
destroyed and the white material would
certainly appear to be so on coming
into contact with the ground. I would
be interested to hear other people’s
views, especially those with a know¬
ledge of ffie history cases.

Simon Bauman,
Basingstoke.

Come to think of it, I can’t recall any
recent ‘ angel-hair ’ cases. Any offers ?
—Ed.

Forthcoming Meetings

Saturday, 2 April, 1977. 7 p.m. “ UFOs—The Photographic Evidence ”

{illustrated).

Saturday, 7 May, 1977. 7 p.m. “ Surveying the Past,” —C A E O’Brien,

CBE, BA, ERAS, FRGS, FGS.

Meetings held in the Lecture Theatre at Kensington Central
Library, Campden Hill Road, London W.8.

9

The Winchester Encounters

As a preamble to this article, it is worth mentioning that at Bufora’s Conference
m Birmingham, 5-7 November 1976, Bernard Delair, editor of Awareness and
fortner secretary of Contact UK, spoke on UFO Waves and Their Prediction
He described 6 year and 10 year cycles, and predicted that the next 6 year wave
U:his cycle produces more Humanoid cases) could start about December 1976 or
January 1977. The Winchester encounter occurred on Sunday, 14 November
so 1 leave it to your judgement as to whether this was too early to fit Bernard’s
prediction. Before you dismiss the coincidence too lightly, bear in mind that
this appears to have been the start of a wave of reports in the UK including two
other close encounters. There have been rumours of activity in Scandinavia
other parts of Europe including Brittany in France, besides Iran and Turkev’
and some of this was continuing in December. Lionel Beer

Encounter One

The two witnesses in the Winchester
case of 14 November were Mr Ted
Pratt and Mrs Joyce Bowles, who have
noticeable Wessex accents. Mrs Bow¬
les, aged about 42, is an extrovert
mother of four sons who lives with her
husband in a semi-detached council
house on the eastern side of Winchester.
She works at Winchester Railway
Station and owns a new white British
Leyland Mini Clubman Estate, reg¬
istered in July 1976. Mr Pratt, bel¬
ieved to be about 60, who lives at the
small hamlet of Nether Wallop, ap¬
peared on television wearing glasses.
He and his wife were visiting the
Bowles family on the evening in
question. He is understood to have
retired for health reasons.

One of Mrs Bowles’ elder sons was
visiting his girlfriend in the nearby
hamlet of Chilcomb. His mother reg¬
ularly drives the mile journey to
collect him, and in fact probably knows
the road like the back of her hand.
That Sunday evening there had been a
touch of frost in the air, which is
thought to have thawed by the time
she and Mr Pratt set out. They left
her house about 8.45 p.m. in her
Mini Clubman.

From her home on the east side of
Winchester, she drove east over a high
concrete bridge which straddles the
A33 Winchester by-pass road. A
straight piece of road, the B3404 leads
past a school and hospital on the north
side and a little further on there is a
cemetery on the south side. A mile
and a half from the bridge just men¬
tioned, there is a major roundabout
where the B3404 joins the A31 to
Alton, Famham and eventually Guild¬
ford. The roundabout and adjacent
road are illuminated by a glare of
orange sodium lights. Mrs Bowles
drove round the roundabout to come
back towards Winchester along the
dual-carriageway of the A31, which
leads down Magdalen Hill Down.
After three quarters of a mile the dual¬
carriageway ends and it was about this
point that Mrs Bowles said, “ I saw
two lights, the first was higher than the
second, which in turn disappeared be¬
hind the scrub (to her left), thus in
neither case were they high in the air.
I drew Mr Pratt’s attention to them.”
She also told us that although they
were orange they were redder than
sodium lights. In an independent
interview with Dr Geoffrey Doel, Mr
Pratt not only confirmed seeing the
lights, but described them as a bright

10

Scene of the November encounter {the Mini Estate would have been facing the camera on the

grass verge).

orange-red object some 40 feet long,
flying at about 800 feet a quarter of a
mile away. The lights/object were
seen in the general direction of the
lane to Chilcomb and it is supposition
that this related to what followed. At
the bottom of the hill, Mrs Bowles
took the lane for Chilcomb, which
means that she would have had to
brake fairly sharply to negotiate the
hairpin bend in second gear. She
also flashed her headlights to warn
traffic coming up the lane. According
to her description, as the Mini was
going down the straight piece of lane,
it shuddered and rattled (as though
perhaps the ignition had stopped
firing?) and the steering appeared to
lock. Both Mrs Bowles and her
passenger struggled with the wheel,
but to no avail. On their right was a
280 yard length of 20-30 feet wide

grass verge (measured from the sign¬
post in the hairpin). This is clearly
used as a picnic spot—probably by
courting couples also, and is level with
the 12 foot lane. Mrs Bowles thought
the car was carried sideways, lifting
olf the ground onto the grass, rather
than skidding off the road. It came to
rest in the middle of the grass, parallel
with the road.

It is interesting to note that Mr Pratt
gave a much more dramatic account of
the car leaving the road. He reached
over to the other side of the steering
column and switched off the ignition.
When they looked up they saw a cigar¬
shaped object partially illuminated by
the car’s headlights, an estimated 5 to
6 yards (15 metres) slightly to the right
in front of their white mini.

continued overleaf
11

Initially Mrs Bowles appeared reluc¬
tant to return to the lane with us and
agreed eventually on condition that she
would not have to get out of Arnold
West’s Volkswagen ‘ caravanette.’ She
no .doubt felt safety in numbers on
arriving near dusk, as she joined us on
the grass verge. It was interesting to
watch her trying to recall the exact
position of the car and the object on
the night of the encounter, and silently
lent a lot of emphasis to her description.

While at the site, she said that during
the encounter she had heard a whisding
sound. There was a definite whistling
sound while we were there, but this
seemed not to make any impact on her,
so presumably the local starlings or
other hedgerow birds were not re¬
sponsible !

We estimated with the use of a tape
measure, that the object, which she
described as like a ‘fat Winston Churchill
cigar ’ would have been about 12
feet long and perhaps about 5 feet high.
Since it was dark at the time of the
incident, she was not sure if she had
seen the full extent of the object, par¬
ticularly as towards the right hand end
of it was what she described as three
brightly lit bow-shaped windows.
During the interview a certain amount
of play was made on the windows,
and Mrs Bowles emphasised that they
were neither oval nor bubble-shaped.
She told us that Mr Pratt said he had
only seen one window, and this is a
point of significant difference in their
accounts. Behind the window (or
windows), they saw three figures,
sitting as though they were sitting in a
bus, in that they were one behind the
other with only head and shoulders
visible.

The object was just above the ground
with vapour underneath it. Mrs
Bowles neatly described the source as
being like an inverted gas stove jet.

Mr Pratt told Dr Doel that the object
was 18" above the ground and sup¬
ported by four jets blowing out gasses.
He also said the cigar was glowing with
a diffused orange-red light. It is
possible that a few seconds elapsed
before they saw a figure emerge out of
the darkness between the cigar’s right
hand side and their car, although no
opening was seen in the object. If the
light from the window(s) had been
very bright, the two wimesses could
have missed seeing a figure coming out
of the end or perhaps from around the
other side. The figure, whom I will
call the MAN, took about 4 or 5 steps
towards the car walking in a normal
manner. As the MAN, described by
Mr Pratt on BBC’s Nationwide TV
programme as being about 6 foot to
6 foot 5" in height, reached the driver’s
door, HE must have turned slightly to
face towards the dashboard. HE then
bent down to look in through the,
driver’s window, and the witnesses
thought HE probably had his left hand
on the roof of the car. This might be
significant in view of what followed.
The MAN glanced along the dash¬
board and the engine suddenly sprang
to life. At the same time the head¬
lights, which were on full beam, shone
so brightly that they expected them to
burn out.

Mrs Bowles said she had been ex¬
tremely frightened even before the
MAN appeared and had buried her
head in Mr Pratt’s shoulder, besides
wrapping her legs around his on his
side of the car. On the other hand,
according to her, the event gave Mr
Pratt the power to be very calm,
despite the fact that he suffered from
angina.

What apparently struck Mrs Bowles
about the MAN were his piercing pink
eyes, which apparently had no discern¬
ible pupils or irises. She was con¬
vinced that it had left some kind of

12

effect on her eyes, like one might
expect from looking at the sun. Apart
from that HE looked very much like
an ordinary man, having short hair at
the front, which came down to the
shoulders at the back and turned up
slightly. HE had sideboards which
met in a roughly pointed beard, but no
moustache. His paleish face, illum¬
inated apparently by a combination of
moonlight and reflected headlights, had
a fairly pointed nose, normal mouth,
and apart from the eyes, otherwise
appeared normal. On the Nationwide
programme, Mr Pratt described the
MAN as wearing what resembled a
boiler suit, with his hair brushed back¬
wards over his head, reaching down to
his shoulders. Mrs Bowles mentioned
at one point that he had silvery specks
in his hair. “ His clothing shimmered
as if being shaken by a wind.” When
HE bent down to look into the car
window his ‘ overall ’ ballooned out
like a cyclist’s cape. His outfit did not
appear to have buttons, but there was a
seam running vertically down the left
side on his chest (ie: his right side).
She described the colour of the outfit
as being that of ‘ Bacofoilf a sort of
dull silver colour.

As the engine was revving, she prob¬
ably had her eyes closed, and eventually
said “ Look out Ted, HE is going round
your side! ” However, Mr Pratt
could see no sign of the being behind
the car, and by the time they looked
back the cigar and its occupants had
completely disappeared. Mr Pratt
offered to drive the car for the rest of
the way, but Mrs Bowles said she was
too frightened for either of them to get
out.

When she started the car herself and
engaged first gear, “ It was like hittir^
a barrier.” The car would not move.
But at the second attempt the car
started without any trouble, and she
was able to drive off the grass. So she

drove on to Chilcomb, a further half
mile down the lane, to collect her son
Stephen. What surprised us some¬
what, was the fact that she chose to
drive back along the same lane leading
out of Chilcomb when there is a per¬
fectly good alternative lane which would
not have lengthened the journey. The
encounter happened between 8.55 and
9.00 p.m., and they were back home in
Winchester by about 9.25 p.m., so
there is no reason to suspect a time
delay factor.

Mrs Bowles told us, “ Mr Pratt phoned
the BBC on our arrival home, mainly to
find out if anyone else phoned in.” The
outcome of this was that they appeared
together on BBC Southern Television
the next day, and it was also mentioned
on the radio in London. On Wed¬
nesday, three days later, they appeared
together on national television at peak
viewing time, on BBC’s Nationwide
programme. Before viewers saw them
Mrs Bates, an attractive long-haired
lady, told of how she had seen a man
in a silvery suit bounding along the
side of the A46 Bath Road the previous
day. Subsequent information, how¬
ever, suggests that this was a hoax per¬
petrated by students at Britsol Uni¬
versity.

Mrs Bowles agreed that the figure she
had seen was similar and did not
appear to be particularly nervous about
appearing on television. Mr Pratt
said he had been startled by what he
saw. After they had given a few de¬
tails of the encounter, a Dr Davis was
introduced and asked for his opinion.
Unlike some BBC ‘ instant ’ experts
on UFOs, he seemed to have some
knowledge on the subjea. He said
that although the two could have had a
genuine experience, it was unlikely to
have been supernatural, further stating
that there had been hundreds of sim-

contimed overleaf
13

ilar reports including the malfunction
of cars from all around the world.
People responded to a deep-rooted
mythology, and while there was a gen¬
uine stimulus, the causes were natural.
The witnesses in the regional studio
were not impressed, and apparently
would have spoken up if they had
realised that their line was open.

Edgar Hatvany, Shirley Bradshaw and
I visited the lane leading to Chilcomb,
where the alleged encounter took place,
on the following Sunday morning.
Our thanks go to Frank Wood for his
verbal directions. After visiting Chil¬
comb itself, to check on the horses,
which are apparently locked up at night,
I examined the grass verge carefully.
The map reference is E-W 506, N-S
290 (OS sheet SU52). The verge is on
the same level as the road and there is
no kerb. At the edge of the grass is
scrub and trees growing on the 4 to 8
foot embankment, which drops sharply
down to a ploughed field. In places
the scrub encroaches onto the grass and
is clearly a popular place for dump¬
ing rubbish and unwanted domestic
appliances. The field showed no un¬
usual marks although it would have
been ploughed prior to the sighting.
While there, we met two young men
with their cars parked on the grass.
One said that he had seen a UFO in
the sky over Winchester earlier in the
year, but had forgotten the date.

There were no obvious ground marks
apart from car tyres at various places.
Nor was there any damage to the scrub
that we could see, and on the other side
of the lane there was a lot of old man’s
beard, a white fluffy growth, which
could have been expected to show up
burn marks or scorch marks. So far
as I am concerned there was no physi¬
cal evidence whatsoever at the site—
not even the narrow tyre marks of a
Mini skidding off the road! Other
investigators apparently went to the

other lane leading to Chilcomb, be¬
cause Mrs Bowles’ description of the
local roads (and she agreed) was mis¬
leading. Therefore reports of un¬
usual findings on the lane near the
MOD rifle range leading off the A33
should perhaps be discounted.

However, there was physical evidence
of a circumstantial and subjective
nature, which is difficult to evaluate.
When we interviewed Mrs Bowles at
her home, she told us that the right
side of her face had become blotchy
the following Monday or Tuesday.
This was confirmed by a neighbour who
was present, and separately by Frank
Wood. The rash had cleared by the
time we arrived some seven days later,
but she said that her neck and right
shoulder had burned for nearly a week.
I have already mentioned that she
thought her eyes had been affected in
some way. She had been feeling
slightly sick the whole week, and felt
unable to eat proper meals. In pas¬
sing she emphasised that she was not
pregnant! She agreed that the symp¬
toms might have been due to the ex¬
citement of the event and appearing on
television, not to mention various
reporters and UFO investigators who
had beaten a trail to her door before
us! She also said that she felt as if
she wanted to sleep for a week.

A further point came to light when
Frank Wood asked if she had been
wearing any metal. Astonished, Mrs
Bowles said that she had taken her
eternity ring off (worn next to her
wedding ring) shortly after the event,
but had not associated it with the
UFO. The skin of her finger under
the ring had become red and sore, so
she put Savlon cream on to soothe the
pain. As a throwaway line, when we
were on the point of departure, she
said she had noticed that a watch that
had been with her had gone haywire,
and was no longer any use for time-

14

keeping. So far as I know, Mr Pratt
has not complained of any adverse
physical effects, but, if anything, felt
mildly exhilarated.

The next piece of information will
probably cause at least a few readers to
draw emotive conclusions. I learnt
early on in my investigation, from a
Winchester reporter, that Mrs Bowles
had come into the public eye in recent
years as a result of poltergeist activity
in her house. At least one of her sons
would have been of a coincidental age.
Exorcism had been performed by a
local rector. She is also known locally
as a ‘ psychic healer ’ and ‘ natural
medium.’ When I heard this I hes¬
itated before investigating further, but
realised that impartial investigation
normally precedes value judgements.

Changing to the locality for a moment,
it is worth remarking that Winchester
has numerous local myths and legends.
Frank Wood discovered that the en¬
counter site lay on a significant ley
line with 7 or 8 good markers. The
South of England is littered with
tumuli, long barrows, ancient settle¬
ments and earthworks, so it is possible
to construct a grid of ley lines there¬
abouts, although I cannot say that they
would all have as many markers!

Without stretching the imagination too
far, there are several aspects of the
story which could be explained in
mundane terms. It should be noted
too that there are minor variations in
the details given by the two witnesses.
The Leyland Mini has been checked
over for possible aberrations, but we
were informed by Mrs Bowles that it
performed as well, if not better, after
the incident than before. Frank Wood
expressed the opinion that the steering
lock was faulty, but although I and
Arnold West looked at it personally,
we could find nothing obviously wrong.
Taking the case overall, and accepting

the honesty of the witnesses, one is led
to the opinion that they had a genuine
and alarming experience. Mrs Bowles
even volunteered to swear on the Bible
that what she said was true. Both
witnesses are apparently convinced
they saw something from outer space.
Mr Pratt thought the cigar-shaped
object was on a special mission, and
thinking back to wartime submarines,
speculated that it would have needed
support from a ‘ mothership ’. So I
will conclude by saying that the prob¬
ability of a UFO encounter remains
open.

copyright—Lionel Beer
January 1977.

Lionel Beer, present chairman of Buf ora's
Executive Council, has been very closely
associated with Bufora since it ‘ gradu¬
ated ’ in 1964 from the former London
Society Luforo, which he helped to
found, and in the numerous positions he
has held, has done much to protect and
promote Bufora's public image as a scien¬
tifically orientated research body — Ed.

Encounter Two

On the evening of Thursday, 30 Dec¬
ember at about 6.30 p.m., Mrs Bowles
decided she would fill up the petrol
tank of her Mini in preparation for an
early start for work the next morning
and Mr Pratt—who, with his wife, is a
very close friend of the Bowles family
—accompanied her.

They took the same B3404 eastwards,
but about one mile from Quarry Road,
just short of the roundabout previously
referred to, there is a petrol station on
the right. Here they filled the tank
and turned back homewards along the
way they had come. This is a straight
unlit part of the road which passes
close to and above the site of their
previous encounter down in the valley

continued overleaf

15

on their left. After only a few yards,
Mr Pratt said, “ Oh look, there's that
big glow in the sky again.'” Mrs B
couldn’t see it, but a few yards further
on she spotted a light going in and out
of the clouds. She then had to cope
with a car passing from ahead with
headlights full on, but a little further on
she could see the object again, and was
now aware of a high-pitched whistling
sound. The car started to rock back¬
wards, forwards and sideways and her
mind became a blank. She then
became aware of the fact that they were
no longer in the car, but were standing
by the car in a room which she took
to be in a ‘ space-craft.’ Three men
were standing regarding them, and one
of these stepped towards them, stand¬
ing close beside Mrs B. There was
another one with a beard and she is
certain that he was the same individual
who had approached their Mini at the
first encounter.

Another ‘ spaceman ’ had a belt with a
large scintillating jewel in the front
which he kept rubbing. He looked
across at one of the others and said
what sounded like ‘ Millager ’ or ‘ Mil-
leeger ’, and they were talking in a
foreign language. They talked to them
in broken English, but seemed well
educated and said that they were
friendly and intended no harm. One
of the spacemen asked Mr Pratt to take
seven steps up to the ‘ room ’, which
he did. He was then asked, “ What
do you feel ? ” Mr P replied to the
effect that it was cooler up one end
than the other—Mrs B cannot remem¬
ber which end was supposed to be
cooler and which warmer and says there
is much she is hazy about now and
cannot remember all the conversation.
{Did anything happen a la the Hills ?—
GD).

The man beside Mrs B pointed over to
the wall where there were several dia¬
grams on transparent material—differ¬

ent patterns, lines and triangles (which
made no sense to her). “ These are
our fields,” he said. “ Fields ? ” quer¬
ied Mr Pratt, evidently thinking of our
green fields. “ No, no,” came the
reply, “ OUR fields,” (in broken Eng¬
lish). The same man, (who was
looking Mrs B ‘ up and down ’), said
to her, “ We are not coming to invade
you ... ”, and Mrs B replied—rather
boldly—“ That's what Hitler said,”
and then feared she had gone too far,
as he seemed angry and replied, “ You
have a very strong tongue,” which made
her feel very nervous.

On being asked about their clothing,
she said it was really the same as on
the first occasion they had seen a
‘ space visitor ’ . . . . silver boiler suits,
but fitting up to polo collar at the neck,
one of them with the belt already men¬
tioned, silver boots, and on the wall
tucked into a loop were a pair of silver
gauntlets. The material again remind¬
ed her of Bacofoil with the shiny side
out. “ They were ‘ nice looking
people said Mrs B, “ zoith long sandy
hair which seemed rather coarser in
texture than our own.” Their eyes
appeared fairly normal but glittered
remarkably: their hands seemed normal
with four fingers and a thumb on each
hand.

Mr P asked, “ Why pick Joyce ? Is it
anything to do with the car?” They
couldn’t understand the replies, but
gathered it was something to do with
putting a hand on the car. The hand
of their orginal Chilcomb visitor had
been placed on the top of their car,
but no mark or physical alteration or
radiation had been found thereon.
They also stated that they would be
back but did not say when. A lot
of signs were made to the two wit¬
nesses and the ‘ spacemen ’ talked a
good deal in a foreign tongue, but the
meaning of this escaped Mrs B and Mr
P. “ There was,” said Mrs B, “ in the

16

middle of the room or spacecraft or
whatever it was, a large bottle-like
structure rising up from the floor, wide
at the bottom and tapering upwards.''
This had bands around it, red, black
and yellow in rings and emblems which
reminded her of horoscope symbols.
Mrs B was rather vague as to the size
of the room, but if Mr P took seven
paces, it must have been at least 20
feet long—and the Mini was easily
accommodated: it was as wide as her
sitting-room, which was 12 feet.

Mr Pratt was then held in conversation,
the details of which Mrs B cannot re¬
member and does not think that he can
either. Everything went hazy, and
they found themselves seated in the
Mini with headlights on by a river
near a road, neither of them being able
to recognise where they were. After
driving around for half an hour or so,
they arrived at Chilworth about ten
miles away to the south of Winchester.
Now they knew where they were and
went home to Quarry Road, arriving
back at 8.15 p.m. They still don’t
know where it was that they regained
their senses. Neither of our witnesses
have had any physical effects since this
encounter .... so far.

Immediately after the incident, Mrs
Bowles felt very calm, but Mr Pratt
did seem rather upset and hazy about
what had happened. We have not
been able to interview Mr Pratt yet,
but in view of the need to include an
account of this second encounter at the
earliest opportunity I have put this
together from Mrs Bowles relation of
the occurrence.

One further incident worth mentioning
is that one evening—I understand prior
to the first encounter in November—
Mrs B saw, in the half-light on the
landing at the top of her stairs, a
shadowy figure which she now thinks
was like one of the ‘ spacemen.’ This

figure was pointing out through the
landing window—in a direction she
has verified as being towards Chil-
comb. Also one morning she was
startled by a rapping on her bedroom
window and could see a silver gauntlet
tapping on the glass but no one attached
to it... . this glove apparently being
of the same pattern as the gauntlets
she saw in the ‘ spacecraft.’

G G Doel
25 January 1977.

Dr ^ Geoff' Doel, MRCS, LRCP,
DMRE, has also been prominent in
Luforo and Bufora affairs since 1959,
having successively been Bufora Vice-
Chairman, Chairman, Vice-President
and President. As a colleague he is
extremely easy to get on with, never
sparing himself in his efforts to forward
Bufora's aims. Aside from the above-
mentioned offices he has acted in a re¬
markable number of official capacities.
Indeed, perhaps only Lionel Beer and
myself could lay claim to as great an all¬
round knowledge and experience of
Bufora's activities and progress since the
Association's inauguration in 1964 — Ed.

Traces Report

Steve Gamble, Bufora’s new Traces
Co-ordinator submits the following
report:

No traces of a landing were found at the
site described by Mrs Bowles. Early
reports that a significant amount of
radioactivity had been found in the area
were tracked down as being due to an
instrument malfunction. Despite there
being no evidence of landing traces, a
mobile geological survey unit was sent to
confirm that these early reports were
incorrect.

An extensive survey was made of the
verge on either side of the road and turn¬
off from the by-pass. The search was

17

carried out using two highly sensitive
radiation survey meters. No significant
amount of radiation zvas detected.

In addition, pH {the amount of acidity)
measurements were made at several
points. The soil was found to be slightly
more acid than normal. This was due
to acid released from decaying leaves and
is a natural phenomenon. Several other
tests were carried out but did not indicate
anything out of the ordinary.

Steve writes: “ . . . . Current projects
that we are working on include re¬
vision of the Traces section of the

Have you read ... ?

W. Raymond Drake

Whilst most readers will be able to
name quite a number of books about
UFOs and associated subjects, it oc¬
curred to me that details of all the

Bufora Handbook and an intensive
course on investigation of Traces cases.
If you feel that you are able to offer
help with either of these, please con¬
tact me as follows: Mr S J Gamble,
Anson Primary School, Anson Road,
London NW2 4AB. All urgent com¬
munication should be dealt with as
instructed in the Bufora contingency
plan of November 1976. This applies
to ALL traces. Photographic and Close
Encounter cases.”

S' J Gamble, aimls.

Norman Oliver

available books by particular authors
might well be of interest, and in this
context I am featuring first of all those
by Raymond Drake.

Raymond was unfortunate in that his
first manuscripts—written before or
about the same time as those of Von
Daniken—were not published until
after Von Daniken’s works had attained
considerable popularity. Whilst, too,
his books are now deservedly enjoying
increased attention in this country,
their first impact was on the overseas
market, and Raymond is well-known
in many parts of Europe, having lec¬
tured frequently in various countries,
addressing the 2nd Ancient Astronaut
Conference in Zurich in 1975 and the
3rd Conference in Crikvenica, Yugo¬
slavia in 1976.

He is also much in demand as a speaker
at home and has spoken at our Ken¬
sington meetings on several occasions.
On 23 October last, he was the featured
speaker at a meeting in the lecture
theatre of the University of Manchester
Insitute of Science and Technology
(UMIST) organised by the Manchester
UFO Research Association (MUFORA)

18

Jenny Randles tells me that although
she had to miss a large part of Ray¬
mond’s Gods and Spacemen talk, she
was pleasantly surprised with his grasp
of scientific knowledge and his handling

of some tricky questions. Having
heard Raymond speak myself I can
vouch for this, and also for the touches
of humour he injects into his talks.
The following are his published works:

1964 GODS OR SPACEMEN? Ray Palmer, Amherst, Wisconsin, USA.
Also 1976 New American Library, New York.

1968 SPACEMEN IN THE ANCIENT EAST. Neville Spearman, London
Also paperback 1973. N.A.L. New York and Sphere, London.

1974 GODS & SPACEMEN IN THE ANCIENT WEST. Sphere, London
and N.A.L. New York.

1974 GODS & SPACEMEN IN THE ANCIENT PAST. N.A.L. New York.

1975 GODS & SPACEMEN THROUGHOUT HISTORY. Neville Spear¬

man, London. Henry Regnery, Chicago. In paperback. Sphere,
London, 1977.

1976 GODS & SPACEMEN IN GREECE & ROME. Sphere, London.

N.A.L. New York, 1977.

1976 GODS & SPACEMEN IN ANCIENT ISRAEL. Sphere, London

(A revised ANCIENT PAST).

1977 MESSENGERS FROM THE STARS. Sphere, London (A revised

GODS OR SPACEMEN?).

Some of the above are also published abroad by Distriubidora Record, Rio, Brazil
Albtn Michel, Paris. Vecchi, Paris. Armenia, Milan. MEB, Turin. Edizione
Medtterranee, Rome. ATE, Barcelona. Taikiri Shobo, Tokio.

Lecture Summary—Contactee Experiences. Important Note

I wish to correct any misrepresentation which may have emerged from my review
of Tim Good’s lecture in the Jan/Feb 1911 Journal. I should make it clear that
many of the assertions credited to Tim were in fact quotations he was citing as
examples, and it should NOT be taken that these ideas are accepted by the speaker.

In a letter to me Tim points out that when he referred to the phenomenon as
being ‘ a modern day up-date of something which has manifested throughout history,''
he was illustrating the modern trend of thought whilst not agreeing with it in this
context. He also asks it to be noted that it was not he who said that Adamski had
been hoaxed or President Nixon contacted: again he was quoting others. In case
the wrong impression be gained, a direct quote from Tim might help serve to
clarify his feelings. “ . . . . Even if some UFOs do emanate from another space-
time continuum, it does not preclude the probability that bona-fide extra-ter¬
restrials have the technological and mental resources to make our latest scientfiic
discoveries look primitive, and their own supernatural by comparison ”

Accept my apologies, Tim. jenny Randles.

19

Sighting Summaries

Code No.

Date

Time

Place

Report

Class

Investigator/

Credit

28.10.75

0030

Lisburn, N.I.

Manoeuvering Lits

B4c

Miles Johnston

28.11.75

2005

Belfast, N.I.

Orange Lits

Miles Johnston

75-243

22.12.75

1825

Belfast, N.I.

Oval red object

C4c

M Duffy

75-247

5.3.75

1839

Maidstone, Kent

Solid white object

C3a

J Castle

75-248

15.4.75

(Midnight)

0000

Andersontown, N.I.

3 gold objects

C3c

M Duffy

75-254

7.1.75

1800

Hainford, Norfolk

Discoid object

C3c

K Williamson

76-025

10.2.76

0625

Kenley, Surrey

Elongated object—
flashing lights

R COLBOURNE

76-252

9.9.76

0644-0648

Huntington, York

Starlike objects

C4b

P Hudson

76-269

10.7.76

2200

*Cipiere, France

Round object

C4b

S Campbell

76-271

19.10.76

1930

Ilford, Essex

Five Lits i

B4c 1

Bob Easton

76-272

11.10.76

2000-2115

Dagenham, Essex

3 manoeuvering lits

■

and

76-273

11.10.76

2130-2145

Ilford, Essex j

White lits

B

Essex UFO

76-274

11.10.76

2300

Goodmayes, Essex

Bright white lits

B

Study Group

76-276

23.9.76

2330

Astley Bridge, Lancs

Round red object

B3a

Digap/Mufora

76-277

23.9.76

2325

Horwich, Lancs

Round red object

B3a

To

76-278

23.9.76

2345

Bolton, Lancs

Orange object

B3a

be a

76-279

23.9.76

2310

Bolton, Lancs

Red flare

B3a

separate

76-280

23.9.76

2315

Bolton, Lancs

Sparkling pink object

B3a

feature

76-281

23.9.76

2330

Bolton, Lancs

Pinky red oval object

B3a

in a

76-282

23.9.76

2315

Bolton, Lancs

Oval red object

B3a

later

76-283

23.9.76

?

Bolton, Lancs

Large red light

B3a

issue

76-284

23.9.76

2330

Bolton, Lancs

Spherical red object

B3a

76-286

14.10.76

2230

Winchelsea, Sussex

Pulsating light

C4b

Miss Barefoot

76-290

9.7.76

1225

Cam Brea, Cornwall

Bright round oscil¬
lating silver object

C4b

R Farrow

76-291

9.7.76

1225

Cam Brea, Cornwall

Bright round oscil¬
lating silver object

C4b

R Farrow

76-292

9.7.76

1225

Cam Brea, Cornwall

Bright round oscil¬
lating silver object

C4b

R Farrow

76-296

5.11.76

0737

S.Benfleet, Essex

Two dazzling lits

C4c

A Collins

76-300

13.11.76

1220

Milford Haven,
Pembs

Inverted cone

■

R JONES-PUGH

76-301

13.11.76

1220

Milford Haven,

Pembs

Inverted cone

■i

R JONES-PUGH

76-305

23.11.76

1000

Milford Haven,

Pembs

Metallic rectangular
object

C4b

R JONES-PuGH

76-306

23.11.76

1000

Milford Haven,

Pembs

Metallic rectangular
object

C4b

R JONES-PUGH

76-307

23.11.76

1000

Milford Haven,

Pembs

Metallic rectangular
object

C4b

R JONES-PUGH

* Witnesses live in Bonnyrigg, Scotland—see “ Points from the Press *’ in JanfFeb Journal.

20

76-025 10 February 1976. 06.25

Kenley Aerodrome, Surrey.

On leaving his home to do a paper round, the
witness perceived an elongated object sur¬
rounded by a row of flashing lights and
emitting a beam of light from underneath.
The witness’s watch had stopped at 06.25,
although the object was in view for approx¬
imately three to four minutes. When he
arrived home, he was in a severe state of shock
and was confined to bed for three days. This
report was investigated by the Ministry of
Defence.

Inv. R Colbourne.

75-237 28 October 1975. 00.30.

Co Antrim, Northern Ireland.

Mr Wyllie, an Ulster TV Transmission Con¬
troller, vvas driving home from work when he
saw a bright yellow light moving slowly in a
south-westerly direction. He stopped his
car to take a better look and estimated the
altitude of the light at 2000-3000 feet. It
then executed a U-turn and disappeared
behind a factory with no sound audible.

Irm. Miles Johnston.

76-286 14 October 1976. 22.30.

Winchelsea Beach, Sussex.

The witness. Miss Cree, and a companion,
were in a car, when a large, pulsating light
approached them from behind the vehicle.
The object then moved away over adjacent
fields towards Hastings.

Inv. Miss Barefoot.

75-243 22 December 1975. 18.25.

Belfast, Northern Ireland.

The witness. Miss Burns, whilst walking down
a Belfast street, noticed a large red object
speeding across the sky in a southerly direc¬
tion towards Jupiter. It was oval in shape
and encased in a red glow. As it passed in
front of Jupiter, the object suddenly vanished.

Inv. M Duffy.

In the last issue, sightings 76, 141/2 were in¬
correctly stated to have occurred on 28-30
March 1976. This should have been 28-30
June 1976, and I am grateful to Mr B Guiver
of Wallington for having pointed out the
error— Ed.

Personal Column

SKYWATCH UFO DETECTOR: Suc¬
cessful magnetic needle type detector incor¬
porating latching circuit and audio alarm,
battery operated. £9-00. Stamped Add¬
ressed Envelope for explanatory literature.
Malcolm Jay, 102 Nelson Road, Chingford,
E4 9AS.

{The use of the word ‘ successful ’ should not be
taken to mean you will automatically see a
UFO, but Malcolm's literature DOES quote
names of purchasers who have — Ed).

The Kent UFO News Bulletin is a new pub¬
lication designed to cover all UFO sightings
in the high activity area of Kent. Published
quarterly, subscription is 34p (4 x 8i stamps).
Overseas 4 international reply coupons.
Send to Christopher Rolfe, Jnr, 16 St George’s
Place, Dymchurch Road, Palmarsh, Kent
CT21 6NE. The publishers would also like

to contact other ufologists in the area to ensure
maximum coverage.

CASSETTE TAPES: Skyquest cassettes now
available as follows; UFOs & YOU £2-65
($4 -50) inc P & P; UFOs OVER ENGLAND
£2-65 (S4-50) inc P & P. Both introductory
tapes including selected reports—with some
sound effects. Good background material;
also ideal for use with talks etc. Permission
to play extracts readily given. SKY EX¬
PLORING—AROUND POLARIS £2-50
(54-25) inc P & P. General astronomical
data and instructions on locating circumpolar
star-groups. Excellent for use on sky watches.
Mso OUR SOLAR SYSTEM £2-50 (#4-25)
inc P & P. If ordering two tapes deduct 20p;
four tapes deduct 50p. Norman Oliver, fras,
Skyquest {BJ), 95 Taunton Road, London,
SE12 SPA. Other titles to follow.

The Bristol-based British Flying Saucer Bureau is now affiliated to the North
Bristol Institute of Adult Education, and monthly meetings will be held through¬
out the year (July and August excepted) at Monks Park School, Gloucester Road
North, Horfield where they will enjoy the amenities and facilities of the Institute.
An enrolment fee of is payable on joining. Future lectures include: Spacemen
and Prehistoric Engineering .7—C Taylor and The UFO Scene in Brazil—G L
Bird. Further details from British Flying Saucer Bureau, 52 Nevil Road,
Bishopston, Bristol BS7 9EH. Tel.: 421360.

in

Books and Leaflets

Title

members

non-members

Guide to the UFO Phenomenon

45p

{all post free)
65p

The Use of Analytical Instruments in the
Search for Extra-terrestrial Spacecraft

30p

50p

David Viewing

Investigation Procedures

30p

50p

Trevor Whitaker

An Engineer’s Look at UFO’s

30p

50p

Leonard Cramp, ARAeS, MSI A

Articles of Association

,01-25 (members only)

Journals as available

35p

50p

(/» some cases, only photocopies of Journals can be supplied, at cost, plus handling and P & P).
All the above publications are available post free from:

Arnold West, Bufora Publications, 16 Southway, Burgess Biill, Sussex
RH15 9ST.

UFO INVESTIGATION—A HANDBOOK FOR UFO INVESTIGATORS

Comprehensive 140-page reference work with loose-leaf format. Price (mem¬
bers) • 50: (non-members) £3 ■ 50—both include p & p. For overseas orders
please remit a sterling cheque drawn on UK bank (Postage for Europe 95p;
USA and Canada ;01-65p airmail: Elsewhere £2 airmail). Cheques payable to
Bufora Ltd. with orders should be sent to: Miss Jenny Randles, Bufora
Research Co-ordinator, 23 Sunningdale Drive, Irlam, Greater Man¬
chester M30 6NJ.

STOP PRESS. Currently there seem to be ‘ mini-flaps ’ occurring in various
parts of the country and one unusual feature is the number of close sightings or
landings reported by groups of schoolchildren AND taken seriously by their
headmasters. Three of these have been in Wales and one in England. It is
hoped to feature at least two of these—one in Pembrokeshire investigated by Mr
Jones-Pugh and another in Anglesey from the Rhosybol Primary School, whose
headmaster, Mr Richard Griffiths, I am in correspondence with at the moment,
in our next issue— Ed.

THE BRmSH UFO RESEARCH ASSOCIATION

Bufora Limited (by guarantee). Founded 1964. Registered Office; Stanley Blythen & Co.,
Hazelmont House, Gregory Boulevard, Nottingham. Registered in London: No. 1234924.
Incorporating the London UFO Research Organisation, fotmded 1959, and the British UFO
Association, founded 1962.

Aims ! To encourage and promote unbiased scientific investigation and research into UFO
phenomena. To collect and disseminate evidence and data relating to UFOs. To co-ordinate
UFO research on a nationwide scale and to co-operate with people and organisations engaged on
similar research in all parts of the World.

Membership : The annual subscription is £5 • 00, $10 in the USA and Canada. Membership
is open to all who support the aims of the Association and whose application is approved by the
Executive Council. Application/information forms can be obtained from any officer.

Burnett’s Printing Works, Cyprus Rd, Burgess Hitt, W Stsssex. Tel. B, Hitt 3126 {STD 044 46).